Two Lawyers from KSW Recognized as Leaders in Employment & Family Law
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
Home
> Lawyer Content
> Blog title on how to fine the perfect lawyer
Link To Youtube
Recent Media
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Contact Us

Canada Bans Wage-Fixing and No-Poaching Agreements Between Employers (Changes to the Competition Act)

November 7, 2022

Employment Law & Employment Standards Act, Business Employment Law and Human Rights, Labour Relations & Union Advice

Canada Bans Wage-Fixing and No-Poaching Agreements Between Employers (Changes to the Competition Act)

Employment Standards
Union

On June 23, 2022, changes to the Competition Act were passed into law which criminalized wage-fixing and no-poach agreements between unaffiliated employers in Canada.

These changes will come into force on June 23, 2023. It is important for both employers and employees to understand how these provisions operate before that date, as these changes open employers found in breach to significant legal exposure.  

The most important changes from an employment perspective are the creation of two offenses which are new to Canadian law:

  1. It is an offense for unaffiliated employers to conspire, agree or arrange to fix, maintain, decrease or control salaries, wages or terms and conditions of employment; and
  2. It is an offense for unaffiliated employers to conspire, agree or arrange to not solicit or hire each other’s employees.

Penalties under Competition Act

The changes to the Competition Act also include significant penalties for wage-fixing and no-poach agreements, including imprisonment for up to 14 years and/or a fine in the discretion of the court.  Notably, the amendments to the Competition Act removed the previous ceiling on fines of $25 million, so the size of the financial penalty that an employer can face is now theoretically uncapped.

Why?

The motivation behind the changes to the Competition Act was to address a gap in the law in Canada which was driven into sharp relief during the Covid-2019 pandemic.  In March 2020, various food retailers in Canada introduced a wage premium to, among other reasons, reward employees who continued to provide essential services during the early lockdowns.  Three food retailers subsequently simultaneously terminated this wage premium in June 2020.

The House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology conducted hearings to look into the matter in July 2020.  The testimony of the representatives of the food retailers before the Committee confirmed that communication had taken place at the executive level regarding the termination of the wage premiums, but all of the representatives denied any coordination, and maintained that their decisions had been made separately.  Notably, under the Competition Act at the time this communication occurred, coordination for the purposes of suppressing wages (had it in fact occurred) was entirely legal.

Proving wage-fixing and no-poach agreements

Notably, the Competition Act allows a conspiracy, agreement or arrangement to be proven through circumstantial evidence.  Accordingly, while the existence of the conspiracy, agreement or arrangement must be established beyond a reasonable doubt to make out the offense, it is impossible to infer the existence of such a conspiracy without direct evidence.  

There is an interesting exception to the wage-fixing and no-poach agreements, in that if it can be shown that the wage-fixing or no-poach agreement is ancillary to a broader or separate agreement or arrangement involving the same parties, and if it can be shown it is directly related to and reasonably necessary to give effect to the objective of the broader agreement, there can be no conviction under the Competition Act.  What this means, in effect, is that employers who enter into a no-poach agreement in certain contexts, such as the purchase and sale of a business or a joint venture, which may reasonably require such a clause in certain circumstances, are likely not in breach of the new provisions to the Competition Act.  Any employer contemplating such an agreement should approach it with extreme caution, and seek legal advice before doing so.

TAKEAWAYS

Employers should consult with legal counsel to review any agreements they have entered into with other unaffiliated employers to ensure that they are in compliance with the new provisions of the Competition Act well in advance of the amendments coming into force in June 2023.  

From the employee perspective, employees who believe that they have been subject to a wage-fixing or no-poach scheme should seek legal advice, as it is possible to ground private civil actions on violations of certain sections of the Competition Act.

Note to Readers: This is not legal advice. If you are looking for legal advice in relation to a particular matter please contact one of our group members. We communicate all these updates to our clients and readers on our Employer Resources Portal and through monthly Newsletters.

Lawyer

Jesse Dunning

Jesse Dunning is a dedicated litigator, whose areas of practice include employment/human rights law, labour law, and general litigation.  As part of his employment law practice, Jesse assists both businesses and employees with terminations, employment contracts, discrimination complaints and all manner of other employment issues. On the labour side, Jesse has assisted both unions and unionized employers navigate labour relations issues.

‍‍

Jesse’s general litigation practice includes a variety of matters, including...

Profile
You may also be interested in...

Contact

Have questions? Need insight? Our team can assist you in examining your options and determining which path best suits your needs.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

*By clicking submit you agree you have read our Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
Disclaimer: the information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as a lawyer-client relationship has been established. By checking this box you agree to receive communications from KSW Lawyers, which may include quarterly email Newsletters containing legal updates (may easily unsubscribe at any time).