Two major court decisions have recently reshaped the legal landscape around Aboriginal title and private land ownership in Canada, raising fundamental questions for governments, developers, and property owners.

‍

Aboriginal rights and title, protected under Canada’s Constitution, were never fully defined, leaving courts to determine their scope over time. Historically, Aboriginal title claims focused on government-owned Crown land, but recent cases have expanded the discussion to privately-owned property.

‍

In Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), the British Columbia Supreme Court made history by recognizing Aboriginal title over property that was owned by private landowners. The Court found that Aboriginal title and private ownership can coexist, and that Crown grants of land do not necessarily extinguish underlying Indigenous rights. While private landowners were not directly impacted in this case, the decision raises the possibility that fee simple interests could be challenged in future proceedings. The Court encouraged negotiated solutions between the Province and Indigenous groups to reconcile overlapping interests.

‍

However, in J.D. Irving, Limited v. Wolastoqey Nation, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal rejected this approach, holding that Aboriginal title and fee simple ownership cannot coexist. Instead, courts may recognize a “finding” of Aboriginal title over private lands to support claims for compensation against the Crown, but not to disturb private ownership.

‍

These conflicting rulings create significant uncertainty nationwide, particularly as both cases move through the appeals process and will likely be decided by the Supreme Court of Canada. For now, most real estate transactions remain unaffected, but enhanced due diligence is increasingly important when buying or refinancing your property, especially for properties within or near asserted Indigenous territories or where developments may impact Aboriginal rights.

‍