KSW Lawyers Partner Featured in Canada’s Top 50 Lawyers.
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
CONTACT
PAY BILL
LINKEDIN
Home
> Lawyer Content
> Blog title on how to fine the perfect lawyer

personal, BUSINESS

Criminal Defence

At KSW Lawyers, our criminal defence team is dedicated to protecting the rights and freedoms of our clients throughout the Lower Mainland. With extensive experience in handling a wide range of criminal cases, our skilled lawyers are committed to providing expert legal representation tailored to each client's unique circumstances. From assault and fraud to impaired driving and property crimes, we ensure a robust defence strategy that aims for the best possible outcome. Trust KSW Lawyers to navigate the complexities of the criminal justice system with skill and tenacity.

Choose a Practice Area
Assault
Section 265 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines assault as follows:
  • (1) A person commits an assault when
  • (a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly;
  • (b) he attempts or threatens, by an act or a gesture, to apply force to another person, if he has, or causes that other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose; or
  • (c) while openly wearing or carrying a weapon or an imitation thereof, he accosts or impedes another person or begs.
Section 265 applies to all forms of assault, including sexual assault, sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm and aggravated sexual assault.
Spousal Assault
If the case is one of domestic violence, also know as spousal assault, generally you will not be released until you agree to not attend the residence where your spouse lives (except on one occasion in the company of a police officer to retrieve your personal possessions), agree to have no contact with your spouse, directly or indirectly, and not attend any place of employment, school, or  place of worship of your spouse. This can create great difficulties in the matrimonial setting and even though the spouse may not want these conditions to remain in place, the spouse simply cannot request that the conditions be removed or the charges dropped. That is up to the Crown, not the complainant.
Sexual Assault
Charges of sexual assault are a specific type of assault under the Criminal Code. Related charges are Sexual Interference, Invitation to Sexual Touching, and Sexual Exploitation. Sexual assault is any sexual contact that happens without consent. It can range from unwanted sexual touching to forced sexual intercourse. A sexual context is deemed to exist if the sexual integrity of the victim has been compromised. The sexual nature of an assault is determined on the basis of all the circumstances surrounding the assault, the part(s) of the body that are touched, the words that are said, the acts that are committed and the intention of the perpetrator. However, the latter’s intention is not always a good indicator of the presence of a sexual context, particularly because touching sexual parts of a person’s body is by its very nature a sexual act, regardless of the intention of the person who commits the act.

Section 271 of the Criminal Code states that everyone who commits a sexual assault is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.

The defence of  a sexual assault charge is a very complicated process due to changes to the Criminal Code as to what evidence is admissible and whether certain evidence in respect to the complainant has to be disclosed to the defence. Because there are a number of restrictions on the type of evidence that can be brought forward by the defence a number of pre-trial applications must be brought to determine whether such evidence may be disclosed to an accused and to determine its relevance. It is crucially important to retain defence counsel knowledgeable and experienced in this area of the law.

If you are dealing with assault allegations, or you have been charged with assault, please contact PG Kent for assistance.
Get In Touch For a Consultation
For more information or to schedule a consultation, call us at 604-591-7321 or click the button below to contact us online.
Get In Touch
Fraud
Section 380 of the Criminal Code defines fraud as follows:
  • (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
  • (b) is guilty
  • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
  • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

If the fraud is for more than one million dollars the Criminal Code imposes a minimum punishment of imprisonment for 2 years.

Market manipulation and stock fraud is set out in subsection (2) which states:
Affecting public market
  • (2) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
If you are facing a fraud charge, please contact PG Kent.
Get In Touch For a Consultation
For more information or to schedule a consultation, call us at 604-591-7321 or click the button below to contact us online.
Get In Touch
Impaired Driving
In America this type of charge is often referred to as a “DUI” which is short for Driving Under the Influence. In Canada you will usually be charged, if it is alcohol related, with both an “.08” charge and a charge of “Impaired operation”. It is important to note that even though you may not meet the legal test for impaired driving, you can still be convicted of driving with a blood alcohol content  of .08 or over. They are two different, but related charges.

Also be aware that a “conveyance” is not limited to a motor vehicle, but also includes operating a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment. “Vessel” also includes a hovercraft.

The Crown will introduce into evidence a Certificate indicating your blood alcohol content taken by a certified technician. There are many technical offenses relating to the admissibility of such certificates. You must now may apply to the court for an order requiring the attendance of the person who signed the certificate for the purposes of cross-examination. The application has to be made in writing and given to the Crown prosecutor at least 30 days in advance of the hearing of the application. The application itself has to be heard at least 30 days before the trial date.

The Criminal Code provisions are as follows:
Operation while impaired
  • 320.14 (1) Everyone commits an offence who
  • (a) operates a conveyance while the person’s ability to operate it is impaired to any degree by alcohol or a drug or by a combination of alcohol and a drug;
  • (b) subject to subsection (5), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood alcohol concentration that is equal to or exceeds 80 mg of alcohol in 100 mL of blood;
  • (c) subject to subsection (6), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood drug concentration for the drug that is prescribed by regulation; or
  • (d) subject to subsection (7), has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood alcohol concentration and a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood alcohol concentration and the blood drug concentration for the drug that are prescribed by regulation for instances where alcohol and that drug are combined.
Operation causing bodily harm
  • (2) Everyone commits an offence who commits an offence under subsection (1) and who, while operating the conveyance, causes bodily harm to another person.
Operation causing death
  • (3) Everyone commits an offence who commits an offence under subsection (1) and who, while operating the conveyance, causes the death of another person.
Operation — low blood drug concentration
  • (4) Subject to subsection (6), everyone commits an offence who has, within two hours after ceasing to operate a conveyance, a blood drug concentration that is equal to or exceeds the blood drug concentration for the drug that is prescribed by regulation and that is less than the concentration prescribed for the purposes of paragraph (1)(c).
For a first offence, the minimum fine is $1000.00 and the minimum driving suspension is one year (and no, there is no limited suspension or ability for an exclusion to drive to and from work).

It is important to note that impaired driving charges are open to a number of defences but they can be of a very technical nature.  It is best to consult an experienced defence lawyer to review the circumstances and provide advice. It may be possible to work out a compromise with the Crown or enter a plea to a provincial Motor Vehicle Act offence, which will not result in a criminal record.

You should also be aware that if you are convicted of certain criminal code driving offences you may fall into the exception to no-fault insurance in B.C. and open yourself up to a civil lawsuit for personal injury, loss and damages. ICBC will not cover you. Any insurance coverage you had  will be held to have been breached. If a successful civil suit is brought against you expose your assets to seizure and sale if a judgment is obtained against you.

Contact PG Kent.  He will work with you to ensure the best possible result.
Get In Touch For a Consultation
For more information or to schedule a consultation, call us at 604-591-7321 or click the button below to contact us online.
Get In Touch
Mischief
Section 430 of the Criminal Code defines the offence of mischief:
  • Every one commits mischief who wilfully
  • (a) destroys or damages property;
  • (b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective;
  • (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or
  • (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.
Mischief in relation to computer data
  • (1.1) Everyone commits mischief who wilfully
  • (a) destroys or alters computer data;
  • (b) renders computer data meaningless, useless or ineffective;
  • (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use of computer data; or
  • (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with a person in the lawful use of computer data or denies access to computer data to a person who is entitled to access to it.
If found guilty of mischief and the mischief caused actual danger to life you could be liable to imprisonment for life.

There is also a separate and different charge of Public Mischief in relation to misleading a peace officer to enter into or continue an investigation. This offence is set out in section 140 of the Criminal Code:
Public mischief
  • 140 (1) Every one commits public mischief who, with intent to mislead, causes a peace officer to enter on or continue an investigation by
  • (a) making a false statement that accuses some other person of having committed an offence;
  • (b) doing anything intended to cause some other person to be suspected of having committed an offence that the other person has not committed, or to divert suspicion from himself;
  • (c) reporting that an offence has been committed when it has not been committed; or
  • (d) reporting or in any other way making it known or causing it to be made known that he or some other person has died when he or that other person has not died.
Punishment
  • (2) Every one who commits public mischief
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
  • (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
If charged with a mischief offence please contact P.G. Kent immediately.
Get In Touch For a Consultation
For more information or to schedule a consultation, call us at 604-591-7321 or click the button below to contact us online.
Get In Touch
Property Crimes
Part 9 of the Criminal Code deals with “Offences against the Rights of Property”. At its most basic theft is taking property that does not belong to you and depriving the rightful owner of its use.

Theft is defined is section 322 of the Criminal Code:
Theft
  • (1) Every one commits theft who fraudulently and without colour of right takes, or fraudulently and without colour of right converts to his use or to the use of another person, anything, whether animate or inanimate, with intent
  • (a) to deprive, temporarily or absolutely, the owner of it, or a person who has a special property or interest in it, of the thing or of his property or interest in it;
  • (b) to pledge it or deposit it as security;
  • (c) to part with it under a condition with respect to its return that the person who parts with it may be unable to perform; or
  • (d) to deal with it in such a manner that it cannot be restored in the condition in which it was at the time it was taken or converted.
Time when theft completed
  • (2) A person commits theft when, with intent to steal anything, he moves it or causes it to move or to be moved, or begins to cause it to become movable.
Secrecy
  • (3) A taking or conversion of anything may be fraudulent notwithstanding that it is effected without secrecy or attempt at concealment.
Examples of property crime include breaking and entering, shoplifting, taking property that does not belong to you, auto theft,  robbery and extortion  This part of the Criminal Code also deals with credit card theft and fraud, and unauthorized use of a computer. Penalties can very widely depending on the nature and severity of the offence committed, and the value of the property taken (depending on whether the property is worth more or less than $5,000.00)

If you are facing a property crime contact PG. Kent today.  He will help you navigate the complex defence process.
Get In Touch For a Consultation
For more information or to schedule a consultation, call us at 604-591-7321 or click the button below to contact us online.
Get In Touch
Please select your sub practice above
Our Criminal Defence Lawyer(s)

Karn Gill

Lawyer

Heading

Surrey, BC

+1 604 591 7321

Email

P. G. Kent

Of Counsel

Heading

Surrey, BC

604-591-7321

Email

Over 100+ 5 Star Google Reviews
50 Years In Business
14 Practice Areas
Offices Across The Lower Mainland
My lawyer was Fiona and she was phenomenal. She fiercely defended me, had all the difficult conversations with the opposing counsel, she even brought me some small snacks for my stressful day. No matter the reason a legal case it’s not fun enduring a legal matter. But Fiona made it a smooth process and the day ended with me feeling relaxed because I had someone strong represent me. If I didn’t have Fiona I would’ve had received what I did at the end of the legal situation. Thank you so much. Legal fees are fair and appropriate. I highly recommend Fiona and this law firm.
Melissa G.
Contacted KSW Lawyers and was put in touch with Jenson Leung. Jenson gave excellent, fair and realistic legal advice with no BS. He was patient and understanding of my concerns and lack of legal knowledge and always took the time to ensure my questions were answered and concerns addressed. I found his advice and conduct incredibly professional, ethical and realistic while representing me during negotiations. I hope in future I have no further need for an employment lawyer, but I have no problem recommending or using Jenson for legal advice or representation if ever required.
Dave R.
I cannot recommend Malachi enough. Going through a divorce is one of the most difficult and emotional experiences I faced, and having her by my side made all the difference. From the very beginning, Malachi provided not only exceptional legal guidance but also genuine compassion and support during an incredibly challenging time. She took the time to listen, understand my concerns, and help me navigate the complex issues involved with patience, professionalism, and expertise. What impressed me most was her ability to remain calm and strategic while advocating strongly on my behalf. She explained every step of the process clearly, helped me make informed decisions, and always made me feel supported and heard. Thanks to her dedication and hard work, I achieved an outcome that felt fair and gave me the sense of justice and closure I needed to move forward with confidence. If you are looking for a lawyer who is knowledgeable, compassionate, and truly committed to her clients, I highly recommend Malachi. I am incredibly grateful for everything she did for me and is an exemplary family lawyer who is incredibly well-versed.
Anonymous
I had a very positive experience with this firm from start to finish. Aleah Hunt was kind, professional, and attentive during the intake process. When there was an issue with email communication, she took the initiative to follow up and ensure everything was received correctly. Lisa Nguyen was also excellent to work with. She was professional, responsive, and helped coordinate a consultation with ease. I then had a 30-minute consultation with Darren, and I was extremely impressed. He took the time to answer my questions thoroughly, provided clear and practical advice, and never made me feel rushed. I appreciated that the conversation focused on helping me understand my situation and options rather than pressuring me to retain legal services. The firm also followed up afterward to ensure my questions had been addressed and to discuss potential next steps. Overall, I found everyone I dealt with to be professional, knowledgeable, and genuinely helpful. I would not hesitate to recommend this firm to others seeking legal guidance.
Crystal L.
Sint doloremque id dolor
Deleniti Nulla Repellendus Laborum
Molestiae sint assumenda sequi iure possimus voluptatem ad. Ut dolore ut est quo a velit. Quae illum optio magnam voluptas minus.
Nihil
Non est aut est sequi sunt quasi debitis eum. Voluptates rerum adipisci laborum voluptatem magnam pariatur voluptas. Perferendis corrupti et
Labore Molestias Nemo Consectetur
Recent Articles

Tailor Your
Representation

Contact us for a consultation today and our team will be happy to direct you to services tailored to your specific situation.

Contact